ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Methodological exploration of stress-based finite element growth modeling for long-term brace treatment evaluation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To propose a stress-driven finite element growth prediction method for evaluating the long-term corrective potential of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. CT data from an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient with Risser stage 4 were used to construct a patient-specific finite element model that included the vertebrae, intervertebral discs, posterior elements, ligaments, and ribs. Three-point corrective forces were applied under gravity and non-gravity conditions, and stress distributions were used to simulate differential vertebral growth. Model validity was confirmed by comparing simulated displacements with bending radiographs. Finite element simulations demonstrated effective in-brace correction under both gravity and non-gravity conditions, with main thoracic curve correction rates of 40.7% and 61.1%, respectively. The maximum displacement occurred at the rib corresponding to the apical vertebra, while peak normal stresses were concentrated at the T9–T10 and T10–T11 intervertebral discs, reaching 808.7 kPa under gravity and 3493.3 kPa under non-gravity conditions. Stress redistribution induced a reversal of convex–concave normal stress patterns within key thoracic and lumbar discs. Stress-driven growth simulations showed reduced vertebral wedging in most segments, with decreases in the three-dimensional height wedging index observed in the majority of vertebrae. The apical vertebra T8 showed the most pronounced improvement in coronal endplate tilt, whereas a mild increase in the global three-dimensional height wedging index was observed in several lumbar vertebrae, likely due to distal compensation and mechanical load redistribution. This study introduces a novel finite element method that emphasizes the prediction of long-term structural improvement under brace treatment. Beyond immediate correction, this approach provides a predictive biomechanical tool for individualized brace design and outcome evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41964772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.