ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Determining the optimal level of buffel grass hay as a source of physically effective fiber in a diet with high proportions of forage cactus for sheep finished in the feedlot.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective was to determine the optimum level of buffel grass hay (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) as a source of physically effective fiber in diets with high proportions of forage cactus on the bioeconomic performance of sheep finished in a dryland feedlot. A completely randomized experimental design was employed, consisting of four treatments and ten replications, with treatments defined by the levels of buffel grass hay (45, 30, 15, and 7.5% of buffel grass hay in the diet’s dry matter). A quadratic effect was noted for intakes of organic matter, dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, non-fibrous carbohydrates, total carbohydrates, total digestible nutrients, and metabolizable energy, with maximum intakes estimated at 35, 42, 23, 20, 25, 10, 25, and 24% of buffel grass hay, respectively. A linear effect was observed for all apparent digestibility variables. A quadratic effect was identified for final weight, total gain, and average daily gain, with maximum gains estimated by the regression model at levels of 27, 27, and 28% buffel grass hay, respectively. Based on productive performance and net income achieved in feedlot, the inclusion of 30% buffel grass hay in diets with high proportions of forage cactus is recommended for sheep in the feedlot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.