Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41964716›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Determining the optimal level of buffel grass hay as a source of physically effective fiber in a diet with high proportions of forage cactus for sheep finished in the feedlot.

Diego Francisco Oliveira Coelho, Juliana Silva de Oliveira, João Paulo de Farias Ramos, Danillo Marte Pereira, Alberto Jefferson da Silva Macêdo, Celso José Bruno de Oliveira, Mateus Lacerda Pereira Lemos, Nelquides Braz Viana, Paloma Gabriela Batista Gomes, Guilherme Medeiros Leite and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Diego Francisco Oliveira CoelhoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil.
Juliana Silva de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil.
João Paulo de Farias RamosDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil.
Danillo Marte PereiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil. danillomarte.zootec@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-7371
Alberto Jefferson da Silva MacêdoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil.
Celso José Bruno de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil.
Mateus Lacerda Pereira LemosDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha, Maranhão, 65.500-000, Brazil.
Nelquides Braz VianaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha, Maranhão, 65.500-000, Brazil.
Paloma Gabriela Batista GomesDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil.
Guilherme Medeiros LeiteDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil.
Edson Mauro SantosDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, Paraíba, 58.397-000, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to determine the optimum level of buffel grass hay (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) as a source of physically effective fiber in diets with high proportions of forage cactus on the bioeconomic performance of sheep finished in a dryland feedlot. A completely randomized experimental design was employed, consisting of four treatments and ten replications, with treatments defined by the levels of buffel grass hay (45, 30, 15, and 7.5% of buffel grass hay in the diet’s dry matter). A quadratic effect was noted for intakes of organic matter, dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, non-fibrous carbohydrates, total carbohydrates, total digestible nutrients, and metabolizable energy, with maximum intakes estimated at 35, 42, 23, 20, 25, 10, 25, and 24% of buffel grass hay, respectively. A linear effect was observed for all apparent digestibility variables. A quadratic effect was identified for final weight, total gain, and average daily gain, with maximum gains estimated by the regression model at levels of 27, 27, and 28% buffel grass hay, respectively. Based on productive performance and net income achieved in feedlot, the inclusion of 30% buffel grass hay in diets with high proportions of forage cactus is recommended for sheep in the feedlot.

Indexed as

Animal FeedCenchrusDietDietary FiberSheep, DomesticAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDigestionMaleRandom AllocationSheepDietary FiberBuffel grass hayConsumptionDigestibilityEconomic indicatorsSheepWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID41964716
PMCPMC13070049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.