ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Russian Translation and Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-International Urogynecology Association Revised.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis study was aimed at translating and validating the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-International Urogynecology Association Revised (PISQ-IR) into Russian and assessing its clinical validity within a Russian-speaking population.
methodsThe PISQ-IR was translated into Russian following the PISQ-IR Translation Protocol of the International Urogynecological Association. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha, whereas external consistency was evaluated by administering the Female Sexual Function Index-Short Form (FSFI-SF), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Clinical data were collected, and the PISQ-IR subscales were compared with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage, pelvic floor muscle tone, and the Oxford Grading Scale.
resultsThe PISQ-IR was completed by 220 women, 76 (34.5%) of whom identified as not sexually active (NSA) and 144 (65.5%) as sexually active (SA). In both the SA and NSA groups, most subscales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.60 to 0.92). Significant correlations were observed between the PISQ-IR scores, POP-Q stage, and ICIQ in the NSA group, as well as between the PISQ-IR scores and the FSFI-SF in the SA group.
conclusionsThe Russian-language PISQ-IR is a reliable and easily administered tool for assessing sexual function in SA women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Nevertheless, the nonsexually active Partner-Related subscale displayed weak consistency in the NSA cohort, possibly attributable to cultural sensitivity surrounding the disclosure of partner-specific sexual matters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41964685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.