Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41964685›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026

Russian Translation and Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-International Urogynecology Association Revised.

Kamila Kenbayeva, Botagoz Aitbayeva, Ayazhan Auyeskanova, Yelena Luchshayeva, Galymzhan Toktarbekov, Dana Baktybayeva

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kamila KenbayevaDepartment of Women's Health Unit, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Turan 32, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9582-0295
Botagoz AitbayevaClinical Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №2, NpJSC "Astana Medical University", Beibitshilik 49, Astana, Kazakhstan. aitbayeva.botagoz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-3936
Ayazhan AuyeskanovaClinical Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №2, NpJSC "Astana Medical University", Beibitshilik 49, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2884-6788
Yelena LuchshayevaDepartment of Women's Health Unit, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Turan 32, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9970-028X
Galymzhan ToktarbekovDepartment of Women's Health Unit, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Turan 32, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7368-2482
Dana BaktybayevaDepartment of Women's Health Unit, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Turan 32, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0995-2246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis study was aimed at translating and validating the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-International Urogynecology Association Revised (PISQ-IR) into Russian and assessing its clinical validity within a Russian-speaking population.

methodsThe PISQ-IR was translated into Russian following the PISQ-IR Translation Protocol of the International Urogynecological Association. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha, whereas external consistency was evaluated by administering the Female Sexual Function Index-Short Form (FSFI-SF), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Clinical data were collected, and the PISQ-IR subscales were compared with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage, pelvic floor muscle tone, and the Oxford Grading Scale.

resultsThe PISQ-IR was completed by 220 women, 76 (34.5%) of whom identified as not sexually active (NSA) and 144 (65.5%) as sexually active (SA). In both the SA and NSA groups, most subscales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.60 to 0.92). Significant correlations were observed between the PISQ-IR scores, POP-Q stage, and ICIQ in the NSA group, as well as between the PISQ-IR scores and the FSFI-SF in the SA group.

conclusionsThe Russian-language PISQ-IR is a reliable and easily administered tool for assessing sexual function in SA women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Nevertheless, the nonsexually active Partner-Related subscale displayed weak consistency in the NSA cohort, possibly attributable to cultural sensitivity surrounding the disclosure of partner-specific sexual matters.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalUrinary IncontinenceAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRussiaSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsPelvic organ prolapseSexual function assessmentSexual healthSurveys and questionnairesUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.