ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Principles and Techniques of Vesicovaginal Fistula Repair.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisVesicovaginal fistula (VVF) are anomalous communications between the bladder and vagina, often arising as a complication of obstetric injury or gynecologic surgery. Patients typically present with continuous urinary leakage. Successful repair hinges on adherence to core surgical principles of adequate exposure, tension-free multilayer closure, and well-vascularized tissue interposition when needed.
methodsThis video article demonstrates the application of these principles across three cases performed via transvaginal, robotic, and open abdominal approaches. The three patients featured all had recurrent or complex VVF following previous failed repairs. Each procedure emphasized careful mobilization of the fistula tract, layered watertight closure, and interpositional flap selection tailored to the individual's prior surgical history and tissue quality.
resultsAll three patients achieved durable closure confirmed by postoperative imaging, with restored continence at follow-up. These outcomes illustrate that the route of repair should be guided by patient anatomy, prior interventions, and surgeon expertise rather than a single preferred approach.
conclusionsSuccessful repair relies on fundamental principles that remain consistent across surgical approaches. When these principles are carefully applied and tailored to individual patient factors, high success rates can be achieved even in challenging or recurrent cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41964684What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.