ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health
Using the Lived Experience From Traditional Midwives in Remote Guatemala to Guide Improvement in Maternal Outcomes.
Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPreeclampsia is the second leading cause of maternal death and accounts for 25% of infant deaths in Guatemala, where maternal and infant mortality rates are among the highest in Central America. One contributing factor is that most women give birth at home with traditional midwives (TMs) with limited reading and writing skills who lack training about obstetric emergencies, such as preeclampsia.
methodsGuided by the World Health Organization's Quality of Care Theory of Change, authors conducted a qualitative study using thematic analysis of focus groups as the data collection method. The study was held in Spanish at 11 locations in the remote Petén department with 179 TMs to explore their knowledge, skills, and practices regarding preeclampsia. Audio recordings of the focus groups were transcribed verbatim and translated into English. Braun and Clark's thematic analysis was used to determine categories from focus group transcripts.
resultsSix categories emerged: (1) knowledge of signs and symptoms, (2) awareness of risk factors, (3) expressions of maternal and fetal risks, (4) position for measuring blood pressure (BP), (5) differentiation between normal and abnormal BP readings, and (6) recognition of patient precautions during hospital transfers DISCUSSION: In remote communities, informal knowledge transfer and experience-based learning play important roles, even in the absence of formal training. This existing foundation provides an important basis for developing structured education programs and promoting greater integration of TMs into the health care system-specifically, to address issues associated with hospital transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.