ArticleEuropean heart journal2026
New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation management and outcomes: the VISION Cardiac Surgery cohort.
Article in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Rhythm Surveillance After Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cancer Survivors: A Cardio-Oncology Survivorship Pathway.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Cancer as a Hidden Catalyst: Rethinking Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsNew-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication of cardiac surgery. We aimed to describe the incidence of postoperative AF (POAF), its management, and its relationship to long-term outcomes in a prospective multi-centre cohort, as our current understanding comes primarily from registries and single-centre studies.
methodsVISION Cardiac Surgery was a prospective cohort of adults who underwent cardiac surgery in 12 countries. The association of POAF with outcomes occurring between 30 days and 1 year postoperatively was estimated using a multivariable Cox model adjusted for patient and operative characteristics and for antithrombotic therapies.
resultsAmong 12 234 patients (55.3% isolated coronary artery bypass grafting), 31.8% had POAF within 30 days of surgery. The proportion of participants with POAF who received anticoagulation alone at hospital discharge was 15.6%, 54.3% received antiplatelets alone, 23.9% received anticoagulation and antiplatelets, and 6.3% received neither; 48.8% were receiving amiodarone. At 1 year, clinical AF was detected in 6.9% of patients with POAF compared to 0.6% in those without [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 11.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.17-15.70]. The primary composite outcome of stroke or vascular death occurred in 2.3% of patients with POAF and 1.5% in those without POAF (aHR 1.32; 95% CI 0.99-1.77). Patients with POAF had a higher risk of all-cause death (3.0% vs 1.7%; aHR 1.54; 95% CI 1.18-2.00).
conclusionsNew-onset POAF occurs in a third of patients after cardiac surgery; its antithrombotic and antiarrhythmic management varies. Patients with POAF have increased risks of both clinical AF and of all-cause death in the year following surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.