ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2026
Unfolding Plant Defence: Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signalling at the Plant-Pathogen Interface.
Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response, a conserved proteostasis network, has emerged as a central hub that reprograms plant immunity during pathogen attack. This review synthesises how plants harness ER-stress signalling to mount multilayered defences and how pathogens have evolved counterstrategies to subvert these pathways. We delineate the molecular integration of the unfolded protein response (UPR) with canonical immune layers including pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), effector-triggered immunity (ETI) and systemic defences, highlighting salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) as rheostats that fine-tune ER stress-immune crosstalk. Functionally, the UPR bolsters immunity by coordinating protein folding and secretion, reprogramming transcription and translation, activating ER-dependent programmed cell death (ER-PCD), and orchestrating ER-associated degradation (ERAD) and selective autophagy. Pathogens such as bacteria, oomycetes and viruses in turn deploy virulence factors that target UPR sensors and transcription factors, thereby attenuating ER-driven immunity. We propose a conceptual framework in which the outcome of UPR activation-resistance versus susceptibility-is determined by pathogen lifestyle, ER stress dynamics, subcellular compartmentalisation and pathogen effector intervention. We also consider biotechnological contexts in which strong transgene expression can itself provoke the UPR, and outline diagnostic experimental strategies to distinguish UPR-mediated effects from intended transgene functions. By integrating molecular mechanisms with pathogen counterstrategies, this review underscores the dynamic interplay between ER stress and immune signalling in plants and highlights opportunities to enhance crop resilience under global climate challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.