ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders
What Influences Speech Pathology Practice for Children with Complex Communication Needs from Multilingual Families? An Australian Perspective.
Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSupporting the development of children with complex communication needs, including development of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems is a multifaceted process. Currently this support does not consistently meet the needs of multilingual families and there is little research to guide and improve practice.
aimsThe present study sought to explore influences on Australian speech pathologists' practice in their work with children with complex communication needs, in multilingual families. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Twenty-three (n = 23) Australian speech pathologists working with culturally and linguistically diverse families of children with complex communication needs were interviewed. Transcribed interview data was analysed with a Thematic Analysis approach. OUTCOMES AND
resultsFour main themes were identified in this study: 1) Expectations of speech pathology services; 2) Pervasiveness of English; 3) Working to address challenges; and, 4) Reflecting on growth and constraints. Findings demonstrate that Australian speech pathologists share many challenges with the international community of speech pathologists in this aspect of service delivery. Speech pathologists navigated differences in their own and family's perspectives and expectations relating to communication, disability and AAC. Pervasiveness of English in Australian society also presented barriers. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The wide range of cultural and language backgrounds in Australia raised challenges in access to and development of necessary and appropriate resources. Systemic restrictions impacted participants' ability to deliver services that meet families' cultural and linguistic needs. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Australian society is multicultural, yet mainstream structures such as therapy services and schools are monolingual. Families who speak a language other than English face challenges in engaging with speech pathology services that meet their needs. What this study adds to existing knowledge This paper adds the perspective of Australian speech pathologists on their work to support children with complex communication needs in multilingual families, where existing research has not included an Australian perspective. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this study? This expands our knowledge of issues and challenges relating to services for children with complex communication needs in Australia's culturally and linguistically diverse society, that in turn contributes to developing more appropriate services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.