ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Understanding the formulation of non-communicable disease policies in Nepal: a qualitative study.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few policies have focused specifically on the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in low- and middle-income countries. Health policy formulation plays a vital role in the allocation of resources to implement effective interventions and reforms; hence, a nuanced understanding of the health policy formulation process is essential. However, there is limited evidence about the process through which NCD policies were formulated in Nepal. This study used Kingdon's multiple streams framework to explore how NCDs were recognized and prioritized, how policy alternatives were decided, how policy windows were opened, and which contextual factors influenced the policy formulation process. A qualitative case study approach was applied to gain a comprehensive understanding of the formulation of major NCD-related policies in Nepal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 key stakeholders and policy documents were analyzed using framework analysis. The NCDs were gradually recognized and prioritized through the convergence of global and local evidence, sustained advocacy, and international commitments. Policymakers encountered several challenges, such as competing health priorities, the chronic nature of NCDs, donor preferences for communicable diseases, financial constraints, and multisectoral complexities of NCDs. The Package of Essential Non-communicable diseases interventions were adopted as a policy alternative, informed by global evidence, World Health Organization recommendations, and lessons from other countries. While coordinated efforts by stakeholders brought the problem, policy, and politics streams together, the role of policy entrepreneurs was found to be less relevant in Nepal's context. The findings highlight the need to consider external influences while conducting similar studies in low- and middle-income countries. Further research is needed on strategies to address persistent structural and financial challenges in NCD policy formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.