ArticleHippocampus2026
The Role of Plasticity in Replay: Stability Through Anti-Hebbian Rules.
Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hippocampal replay is now considered to be a cornerstone of memory consolidation, yet the synaptic plasticity rules governing its dynamics remain elusive. Under the standard asymmetric Hebbian spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) model, the same spike patterns that promote activity propagation along one direction of sequential activation undermine propagation in the reverse direction, compromising "bidirectional" replay. On the other hand, symmetric potentiation rules, as recently proposed for region CA3, risk corrupting the memory trace by saturating synaptic weights. Using Ecker et al.'s recurrent network model of place cells that spontaneously generate replays during ripples, we systematically investigated how different STDP plasticity rules modulate offline replays. We developed a classification framework to study the mechanisms relating different STDP kernels to key replay characteristics, including directionality, speed, and stability. Our results confirmed that symmetric potentiation rules during offline states saturate synapses, inducing rigid attractors that corrupt the memory trace, and that an asymmetric Hebbian STDP kernel induces strong biases in the directionality of replay, leading to rapid replay acceleration and replay degradation. Notably, we found that an asymmetric anti-Hebbian STDP kernel preserves replay bi-directionality and stabilizes replay speed. We further identified the negative timing component of the STDP rule as the primary driver of replay speed: potentiation causes deceleration, while depression causes acceleration. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for empirically observed replay deceleration and suggest a role for anti-Hebbian synaptic depression in stabilizing replay dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.