Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41964401›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2026

The Role of Plasticity in Replay: Stability Through Anti-Hebbian Rules.

Lior Baron, Kamran Diba, Asohan Amarasingham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lior BaronDepartment of Computer Science, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kamran DibaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5128-4478
Asohan AmarasinghamDepartment of Computer Science, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Consolidation and interference of hippocampal spatial mapsR01MH139216 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GYORGY BUZSAKI, KAMRAN DIBA · 2025 to 2026
$1.2M
National Science Foundation 2423995National Science Foundation PHY-230195NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH139216NIMH NIH HHS R01MH139216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal replay is now considered to be a cornerstone of memory consolidation, yet the synaptic plasticity rules governing its dynamics remain elusive. Under the standard asymmetric Hebbian spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) model, the same spike patterns that promote activity propagation along one direction of sequential activation undermine propagation in the reverse direction, compromising "bidirectional" replay. On the other hand, symmetric potentiation rules, as recently proposed for region CA3, risk corrupting the memory trace by saturating synaptic weights. Using Ecker et al.'s recurrent network model of place cells that spontaneously generate replays during ripples, we systematically investigated how different STDP plasticity rules modulate offline replays. We developed a classification framework to study the mechanisms relating different STDP kernels to key replay characteristics, including directionality, speed, and stability. Our results confirmed that symmetric potentiation rules during offline states saturate synapses, inducing rigid attractors that corrupt the memory trace, and that an asymmetric Hebbian STDP kernel induces strong biases in the directionality of replay, leading to rapid replay acceleration and replay degradation. Notably, we found that an asymmetric anti-Hebbian STDP kernel preserves replay bi-directionality and stabilizes replay speed. We further identified the negative timing component of the STDP rule as the primary driver of replay speed: potentiation causes deceleration, while depression causes acceleration. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for empirically observed replay deceleration and suggest a role for anti-Hebbian synaptic depression in stabilizing replay dynamics.

Indexed as

HippocampusModels, NeurologicalNeuronal PlasticityAction PotentialsAnimalsNeuronsSynapsesCA3 recurrent networkhippocampal replaymemory consolidationsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41964401
PMCPMC13069501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.