Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41964399›Full record

ArticleWaste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA2026

Assessing the process performance of ballistic separators in packaging waste sorting plants using sensor-based process monitoring.

Alena Maria Spies, Tabea Scherling, Annika Ludes, Bastian Küppers, Nils Kroell, Karoline Raulf, Kathrin Greiff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Assessing the process performance of ballistic separators in packaging waste sorting plants using sensor-based process monitoring.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alena Maria SpiesChair of Anthropogenic Material Cycles (ANTS), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2186-0520
Tabea ScherlingChair of Anthropogenic Material Cycles (ANTS), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
Annika LudesSTADLER Anlagenbau GmbH, Altshausen, Germany.
Bastian KüppersSTADLER Anlagenbau GmbH, Altshausen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-4786
Nils KroellChair of Anthropogenic Material Cycles (ANTS), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6016-5144
Karoline RaulfChair of Anthropogenic Material Cycles (ANTS), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-6605
Kathrin GreiffChair of Anthropogenic Material Cycles (ANTS), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9854-7722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To effectively utilise secondary raw materials, pre-concentrates of defined quality are required. Packaging waste streams are treated in waste sorting plants, where different sorting operations are applied. Ballistic separators are frequently used to separate 2D and 3D materials during (pre)conditioning and therefore have a major influence on the overall process performance. Despite their widespread use, until now, few studies have examined how parameter settings affect the performance of ballistic separators. To assess and optimise process performance, we conducted a parameter study on packaging waste using an industrial-scale ballistic separator and near-infrared-based process monitoring. At 22.5 wt% 2D input content, we varied 2D material properties, paddle angle (15°, 17.5°, 20°), rotational speeds (

Indexed as

Product PackagingRefuse DisposalSolid WasteWaste ManagementSolid Wastecircular economylightweight packaging wastematerial recovery facilitymechanical processingpaper and board recyclingprocess automationprocess optimisation

Identifiers

PMID41964399
PMCPMC13530357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.