ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Risdiplam Add-On Therapy Following Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in Children With Spinal Muscular Atrophy and 2 SMN2 Copies: A Multi-Center Case Series.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsThree disease-modifying therapies are approved for individuals with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA); however, data concerning the combination of these therapies remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of add-on risdiplam in children who had experienced clinical deterioration despite gene therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec.
methodsThis is a retrospective case series study at two centers of children treated with risdiplam who had previously received onasemnogene abeparvovec. Therapy was evaluated by clinical examination, standardized physiotherapeutic assessments, and parent perspectives.
resultsFive patients with SMA (four male and one female), diagnosed between 0 and 8 months, were included in the study. All had 2 SMN2 copies and were started on risdiplam between five and 48 months after onasemnogene abeparvovec. Risdiplam was added due to motor regression, dysphagia, new onset of respiratory insufficiency, and/or recurrent pneumonias. Four children showed improvements in motor development, swallowing, and respiratory function. One child remained stable. Parents perceived a significant improvement in general impression, motor, and respiratory function. The add-on therapy was well tolerated without adverse events. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate an improvement in most children in a case series through add-on risdiplam. Evaluating clinical outcome parameters in clinical practice may prove challenging and should be complemented by the parental perspective. The decision regarding the use of add-on therapy in children with SMA who receive one line of treatment but show a clinical deterioration should be considered on an individual level, and assessments of predefined therapeutic goals are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.