ArticleANZ journal of surgery
Antibiotics in Uncomplicated Diverticulitis: Are we Aligning With the Evidence? A Retrospective Two-Centre Study.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColonic diverticulitis is a common diagnosis at emergency presentation, and traditional management includes admission, bowel rest and intravenous antibiotics. We investigated the management of patients who presented to two centres over a 2-year period with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) in the context of evidence and recent guidelines suggesting that select patients can be managed safely in the outpatient setting and without antibiotics.
methodsData was collected for all patients who presented to two metropolitan emergency departments from January 2023 to December 2024 with AUD. Each case was then assessed against predetermined criteria for admission, based on recent guidelines and randomised controlled trials. The primary outcome was use of antibiotics in those eligible for management without them. Secondary outcomes included IV antibiotic use and reasons for admission.
resultsA total of 564 patients across the two centres were included. 229 patients were deemed eligible for nonantibiotic therapy +/- discharge. 130 of these patients were admitted; all received antibiotics. Only eight of 229 did not receive antibiotics. Outside of these 130 patients admitted without clear indication, the most common reasons for admission were sepsis, failure of outpatient therapy and age.
conclusionMost eligible patients with AUD still receive antibiotics, in both inpatient and outpatient settings, which highlights a major discrepancy between evidence-based guidelines and real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.