ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Provenance-Specific Chilling and Forcing Requirements Shape Spring Phenology in Three European Temperate Tree Species.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global warming is altering spring phenology in temperate forests, with important consequences for tree survival, growth, and ecological interactions. However, temperature requirements for dormancy release and budburst vary among populations adapted to different climatic conditions, complicating predictions of spring phenology across broad geographic regions. Here, we quantified the chilling and forcing requirements of three deciduous tree species (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus robur, and Tilia cordata) using four provenances per species spanning a latitudinal gradient from Spain to Poland. Saplings were overwintered under either ambient or warmed open-top chambers and were transferred monthly from November to February to a climate chamber under constant forcing conditions. We found that reduced chilling due to earlier transfer substantially delayed budburst, with T. cordata showing the highest chilling requirement, followed by F. sylvatica, whereas Q. robur exhibited the lowest. We detected both co- and counter-gradient patterns of genetic variation in budburst timing. In Q. robur and, to a lower extent, in T. cordata, Polish provenances budburst later than Spanish ones, while German and Swiss populations were intermediate (co-gradient). In contrast, F. sylvatica showed the opposite pattern with the Spanish provenance tending to budburst latest and the Polish one earliest (counter-gradient). These differences likely reflect genetic differentiation in chilling and forcing requirements among provenances, likely driven by variation in frost risk at their sites of origin. Importantly, insufficient chilling significantly reduced budburst success by 25%-85% across species, with the strongest effect in T. cordata, where success fell below 10% in saplings transferred in November or December across all provenances, potentially constraining canopy development and impairing growth and reproduction. These findings underscore the critical role of winter chilling in regulating budburst timing and canopy development, as well as provenance-specific adaptation, suggesting that species adapted to low chilling might be candidates for assisted migration under rapid climate warming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.