ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026
Interpretable multi-omics machine learning reveals drought-driven shifts in plant-microbe interactions.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Omics Dissection of Drought Stress Responses in Crops: From Molecular Regulatory Networks to Climate-Resilient Breeding Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Beyond static snapshots: predicting dynamic, explainable intermediate phenotypes for climate-resilient crop breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere are central to plant growth, nutrient acquisition, and stress resilience. Although multi-omics approaches enable comprehensive profiling of different biological layers, integrating these data to understand the mechanisms underlying plant-microbe symbiosis, particularly under drought stress, remains a challenge.
resultsGenomic, metabolomic, and microbiome data from 198 soybean accessions grown under both control and drought conditions were integrated to identify environment-specific predictive features of the plant phenotypes. We compared best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), genome-wide association study (GWAS), and a nonlinear machine learning model to evaluate their ability to detect informative features. The machine learning models provided flexible variable selection and outperformed linear models in capturing nonlinear dependencies. Model interpretation using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) indicated that the isoflavone derivative, daidzin, and the drought-tolerant Candidatus Nitrosocosmicus, were major contributors to phenotypic variation, specifically under drought stress. SHAP-based interaction networks indicated cross-omics links, including connections between daidzin, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and Paenibacillus.
conclusionThe proposed interpretable machine learning approach for plant phenotype prediction identified multi-omics biomarkers and interactions, providing insights into plant adaptation to drought stress through environment-dependent rhizosphere networks and symbiotic associations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.