ArticleVirology journal2026
Evaluation of two virome probe hybridization capture panels for food safety surveillance.
Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, viromics has received growing attention for viral disease surveillance. This study set out to compare the VirCapSeq-VERT panel and the Comprehensive Viral Research Panel (CVR Panel) for probe hybridization capture of viral nucleic acids in oyster extracts, a main vehicle for the transmission of foodborne viruses. Using ten-fold serial dilutions of human norovirus (hNoV) GI.2 and GII.4 spike-in oyster extracts, both hybridization capture panels achieved detection levels down to 14 genome copies (gc) for hNoV GI.2 and 5 gc for hNoV GII.4. For hNoV GI.2, a genome coverage of ≥ 95% was achieved at 59 gc using the CVR Panel, whereas 724 gc were required for a similar coverage using VirCapSeq-VERT. For hNoV GII.4, a genome coverage of ≥ 97% was achieved at 87 gc with either panel. Next, the hybridization capture performance was compared for a mixture of various foodborne viruses (hNoV GI.2, hNoV GI.3, hNoV GII.4, hepatitis A virus and hepatitis E virus) in the absence of matrix and in the presence of oyster matrix. Sensitive detection of all added viruses was observed at low input levels (less than 200 gc/constructed library) in oyster extract. Taken together, the CVR Panel seems as good as, or slightly more sensitive than, VirCapSeq-VERT for the viruses tested. The availability of various viral enrichment panels, together with foreseen improvements regarding the cost-effectiveness and accessibility, is poised to facilitate broad hazard assessment and genomic profiling techniques in food virology, thereby enhancing food safety and improving early warning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.