Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41964013›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026

A three-way partnership: reflections and lessons from co-producing social care research with practitioners, researchers and the public.

Julia Greig, Wenjing Zhang, Kate Wortham, Karin Webb, Eirini-Christina Saloniki, Robin Darton, Ann-Marie Towers, Helen Salisbury, Janet Richardson-Simmonds, Sharon Leaver

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia GreigIndependent Social Worker, Octavia Consulting, East Sussex, UK.
Wenjing ZhangHealth and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, The Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK. Wenjing.zhang@kcl.ac.uk.
Kate WorthamExpert by Lived Experience, London, England, UK.
Karin WebbExpert by Lived Experience, London, England, UK.
Eirini-Christina SalonikiGlobal Business School for Health, UCL East (Marshgate) University College London, London, UK.
Robin DartonCare and Outcomes Research Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Ann-Marie TowersHealth and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, The Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Helen SalisburyExpert by Lived Experience, London, England, UK.
Janet Richardson-SimmondsExpert by Lived Experience, London, England, UK.
Sharon LeaverAdult Social Care and Health, East Sussex County Council, Eastbourne, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Social Care Research (SSCR) P182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-production in social care research seeks to bridge the gap between academic inquiry, frontline practice, and lived experience by actively involving practitioners, researchers, and public members as equal partners throughout the research process. However, sustaining and balancing this three-way partnership remains challenging in practice. CASE STUDY: This paper reflects on the ‘Better Care Moves’ project, a co-produced study involving social care practitioners and managers, academic researchers, and public members with lived experience of life and care transitions, such as hospital discharges to care homes and moves into and between social care settings. The team shared reflections on their experiences of co-production in this project through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, guided by the principles of co-production. Key lessons were identified under two themes: (1) including, valuing, and learning from all perspectives, and (2) power sharing and relationship building. The co-production approach in this project enabled recognition of diverse expertise - practice knowledge, lived experience, and research skills - while fostering mutual learning and skill development. Challenges included limited diversity among public members, demands on practitioner time, and navigating power differentials. Team members highlighted the importance of clarity in roles, mutual respect, and ensuring all voices were heard and valued. The project produced practical resources and strengthened cross-sector networks, demonstrating the tangible benefits of co-production for research and practice.

conclusionCo-production is an evolving, relational process that requires sustained commitment to inclusion, valuing diverse contributions, and sharing power. While roles differ, equality of respect is essential. Future co-production should strengthen diversity, support consistent participation, and embed transparent decision-making. The ‘Better Care Moves’ project illustrates how co-production can generate accessible knowledge and practical tools for both research and practice to the benefit of those who experience social care services.

Indexed as

CarerCo-productionLived experienceMoveOlder peoplepractitionerSocial careSocial workStaffTransition

Identifiers

PMID41964013
PMCPMC13069769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.