Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963890›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Attitudes towards electronic health records and attending training among licensed practical nurses: a cross-sectional survey study.

Laura Hietapakka, Marko Elovainio, Anu-Marja Kaihlanen, Tuulikki Vehko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura HietapakkaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, 00271, Finland. laura.hietapakka@thl.fi.
Marko ElovainioFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, 00271, Finland.
Anu-Marja KaihlanenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, 00271, Finland.
Tuulikki VehkoFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, 00271, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of information on the possible attitudinal factors that might explain why professionals attend or do not attend electronic health record training. We investigated whether the dimensions defined by the Attitudes toward Guideline Scale (general attitude, usefulness, reliability, lack of individual competence, lack of organizational competence, and impracticality) were associated with attending electronic health record training among licensed practical nurses.

methodsCross-sectional survey data were collected in the spring of 2024 from licensed practical nurses working in Finland (N = 2295). Binary logistic regression analyses were conducted in two steps examining both the univariable and multivariable associations between attitudes and attending training.

resultsLicensed practical nurses with higher digital dedication (OR 1.10, CI 1.02–1.18) had higher odds of attending electronic health record training within the last 3 years. Lack of basic IT and documentation skills (OR 0.72, CI 0.63–0.83) and lack of support for electronic health record use within the unit (OR 0.56, CI 0.50–0.62) had lower odds of attending such training withing the last 3 years. In the multivariable analysis, lack of basic IT and documentation skills (OR 0.77, CI 0.66–0.90), and lack of support for electronic health record use within the unit (OR 0.57, CI 0.51–0.64) remained associated with a lower likelihood of attending training during the 3-year period.

conclusionsHealth and social care organizations need to especially ensure that their professionals have the basic skills to use technology and that there are supporting personnel in the work unit to offer help with using electronic health records when needed. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

AttitudesClinical guidelinesInformation systemsNursesSurvey study

Identifiers

PMID41963890
PMCPMC13085332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.