ArticleBMC public health2026
Socioeconomic determinants of COVID-19 incidence in a German rural area.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study examines the relationship between local-level socioeconomic factors and the incidence of COVID-19 infections in rural Germany. It does so by analyzing small spatial units (i.e. municipalities in the district of Bad Kreuznach, Rhineland-Palatinate), thereby addressing the research gap in the context of rural areas. By examining localized dynamics, the study sheds light on the socioeconomic determinants.
methodsAn anonymized dataset of all reported COVID-19 cases of unvaccinated persons with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the rural district of Bad Kreuznach between 03/04/2020 and 01/06/2021 was analyzed using a negative binomial generalized linear model. The following socioeconomic factors were considered: GISD employment subscore, income tax per resident (at municipality and municipal association levels), population density, number of residents, presence of a hospital, and regional population potential.
resultsA statistically significant influence of the variable income tax per capita was found at both the municipal level (coefficient − 1.072; p = 0.0224) and at the municipal association level (coefficient 2.914; p = 0.0033). A significant correlation was also found with the presence of a hospital (coefficient 0.773; p = 0.0091). Excluding the city of Bad Kreuznach did not change the main results. DISCUSSION: In rural areas, the influence of socioeconomic factors was less pronounced than in studies of metropolitan regions and larger spatial units. In this study, only income tax per capita and the presence of a hospital were statistically significant, which may have been affected by unobserved confounders. Further research on smaller spatial units is needed to better understand the local impacts of socioeconomic factors and support targeted public health policy decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.