ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Public awareness about the emergency conditions and services provided by emergency medical services in the Northern Border Region of Saudi Arabia.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency Medical Services (EMS) are critical for prehospital care, yet their effectiveness can be undermined by inappropriate utilization and limited public recognition of true emergencies. This study assessed public knowledge of emergencies and EMS services in the Northern Border Region of Saudi Arabia.
methodsA cross‑sectional online survey was conducted between May and December 2025 among adults aged 18–50 years residing in the Northern Border Region. A culturally adapted, previously validated 40‑item questionnaire was disseminated via social media to collect socio‑demographic data, assess EMS knowledge and practices, and evaluate responses to 24 hypothetical emergency and non‑emergency scenarios. Descriptive statistics, chi‑square/Fisher’s exact tests, and multiple logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with correct scenario‑based responses.
resultsA total of 1074 participants completed the survey; most were female (58.1%), Saudi nationals (92.5%), and aged 36–46 years (37.0%). Nearly all respondents (99.1%) reported they would call EMS for an unconscious person, and 99.0% correctly identified the EMS number (997). 99.6% knew that EMS both transports and treats patients, and 98.3% understood the dispatcher’s role in receiving calls and providing advice. Scenario performance was less consistent. While 92.3% correctly recognized an elderly patient with acute speech difficulty as an emergency, only 36.2% identified a 35‑year‑old woman with chest heaviness as an emergency. Conversely, 56.9% correctly classified a 30‑year‑old woman with lower abdominal pain and urinary symptoms as a non‑emergency, and only 0.09% recognized that a 4‑year‑old with a foreign body in the ear did not require EMS activation. Older age (≥46 years), female sex, lower education, retirement, Saudi nationality, residence in Arar, and no prior EMS call were independently associated with fewer correct responses (all p < 0.001).
conclusionIn the Northern Border Region, basic EMS knowledge is high, but substantial gaps remain in recognizing specific emergency and non‑emergency conditions. Targeted public education focusing on symptom‑based emergencies and appropriate EMS utilization is needed to optimize EMS effectiveness and resource use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.