ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
DecoderDTA: enhancing drug-target binding affinity prediction via decoding fidelity in multi-task learning.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal machine learning and deep graph neural networks for the prediction of molecular inhibitory activity and disease associations.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of drug–target binding affinity (DTA) is essential for in silico drug discovery. Existing deep learning approaches typically optimize solely for affinity regression, which can lead to overly compressed representations that lose partial structural and semantic information. We introduce DecoderDTA, a multi-task framework that improves established DTA backbones by incorporating an auxiliary sequence reconstruction task to enforce decoding fidelity. During training, these decoders are tasked with reconstructing the raw SMILES strings and amino-acid sequences. This auxiliary reconstruction objective acts as a decoding fidelity, which encourages the encoders to retain richer structural and semantic information without introducing additional computational overhead during inference. On the Davis and KIBA benchmarks, DecoderDTA variants consistently improve performance. For instance, DeepDTA-Dec reduces the MSE from 0.261 to 0.220 on Davis (a ≈15.7% relative improvement) and from 0.194 to 0.167 on KIBA (≈13.9%), while also increasing the CI and [Formula: see text] metrics. Similarly, GraphDTA-Dec shows consistent improvements. Ablation studies reveal an interesting phenomenon: jointly optimizing both reconstruction tasks does not consistently outperform using a single decoder. This finding highlights the complex interplay of objectives within the multi-task framework and points to an important direction for future architectural refinements, such as adaptive task weighting. Nevertheless, the consistent improvements achieved by all DecoderDTA variants over their respective baselines demonstrate that incorporating decoding fidelity is an effective and generalizable strategy for enhancing DTA prediction, offering a new perspective for representation learning in this task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41963700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.