ReviewArchives of pharmacal research2026
Recent paclitaxel formulation strategies: expanding the therapeutic index by addressing biopharmaceutical and toxicity limitations.
Review in Archives of pharmacal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymeric Therapeutic Nanosystems Containing Paclitaxel: Novel Strategies, Therapeutic Potential, Challenges, and Translation Problems.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- SIVA1 Knockdown Drives Aggressive Phenotypes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells while Enhancing Paclitaxel Efficacy.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Emerging paradigms in nanostructured targeted drug delivery systems.Discover nano · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paclitaxel (PTX) is a standard-of-care antineoplastic agent that stabilizes microtubules. However, its clinical utility is limited by dose limiting toxicities (e.g., myelosuppression and neuropathy), influencing decades of formulation development. Therefore, this review aims to analyze formulation strategies developed to address the three primary limitations. First, solvent-free formulations (e.g., albumin-bound PTX) mitigated the solvent-related toxicity and nonlinear pharmacokinetics of Cremophor EL-based PTX, improving the safety profile by eliminating hypersensitivity reactions. Second, intravenous formulations using liposomes or polymeric micelles for mitigating dose limiting toxicities via prolonged circulation and enhanced tumor retention demonstrated inconsistent clinical translation. Recently, active targeting platforms aimed to keep PTX largely inactive systemically while promoting mechanism-triggered delivery or tumoral uptake are under preclinical evaluation to expand the therapeutic index. Third, poor oral bioavailability, attributed to P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated efflux and first-pass metabolism, was addressed via two strategies: gut-specific P-gp inhibition and lipid-based bypass formulations; however, interpatient absorption variability remains limited. In this review, decades of formulation research, tracing the evolution of PTX from a challenging molecule to a versatile therapeutic platform, were synthesized, highlighting the effect of addressing key biopharmaceutical and toxicity limitations in expanding its therapeutic index. Additionally, we examined the factors contributing to the frequent failure of passive targeting strategies to separate tumor exposure from systemic toxicity in human solid tumors. In conclusion, understanding PTX formulation strategies may facilitate future therapies to adopt flexible administration routes, incorporate biomarker-guided decision-making, and achieve controlled systemic exposure to reduce intrinsic dose-limiting toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.