ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Phase-constrained zero-shot self-supervised learning for BLADE liver MRI reconstruction.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLiver MRI plays a critical role in the diagnosis and monitoring of liver disease; however, image quality is often degraded by respiratory motion and noise, particularly in high-resolution and diffusion-weighted imaging. Propeller-based sequences such as BLADE improve motion robustness, but advanced reconstruction strategies are required to fully exploit their potential under accelerated conditions.
methodsWe propose a phase-constrained zero-shot self-supervised learning (PC ZS-SSL) framework for BLADE liver MRI reconstruction. The method embeds BLADE forward and adjoint operators within an unrolled deep network together with an explicit phase estimation module. Unlike supervised approaches, PC ZS-SSL requires no external training data and instead leverages partitioned k-space. The framework was first evaluated using structured phantom experiments assessing spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability, and subsequently applied to in vivo 3 T T2-weighted (T2W, 20 blades) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, 18 and 15 blades, b = 0, 800 s/mm
resultsIn phantom studies, PC ZS-SSL preserved fine structural details and demonstrated improved sharpness compared with fewer gradient updates and LLR. In vivo, PC ZS-SSL consistently reduced noise and ringing artifacts while maintaining anatomical fidelity. In T2W imaging, it achieved image quality comparable to LLR with fewer artifacts. In DWI, where noise is more pronounced, PC ZS-SSL provided clearer organ boundaries than both LLR and vendor reconstructions. Additional in vivo evaluation demonstrated that PC ZS-SSL remained robust under severe undersampling conditions (e.g., 4 blades) and challenging imaging scenarios, where LLR reconstructions exhibited residual artifacts.
conclusionPC ZS-SSL enables high-quality, artifact-suppressed BLADE liver MRI without the need for external training data. Its strong performance in both phantom and in vivo experiments-particularly under high-noise diffusion conditions-highlights its potential for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41963628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.