ReviewEvidence-based dentistry2026
Supervised toothbrushing programmes and at home brushing behaviour: a rapid review of evidence.
Review in Evidence-based dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Supervised toothbrushing programmes (STPs) are widely implemented to improve children's oral health, yet it remains unclear which behaviour change techniques (BCTs) they use and whether these support children's toothbrushing at home. This rapid review addresses this evidence gap to inform programme design and evaluation. AIM(S): To conduct a rapid review of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used in supervised toothbrushing programmes (STP1qs) and assess whether they support children's at-home toothbrushing.
methodsA rapid review (Feb-Mar, updated Jul 2025) across PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and PsycINFO. Inclusion criteria focused on primary studies on children ≤12 years, STPs with any link to home brushing. Behaviour change techniques (BCTs), the active ingredients in changing behaviours, identified in included studies were code according Behaviour Change Taxonomy (BCTv1). BCTs were also mapped to COM-B mode of behaviour change and the Theoretical Domains Framework. There was no formal quality appraisal.
resultsFrom 187 records, 153 were screened, 16 full texts assessed, and 4 studies included (randomised controlled trials, mixed-methods, single-case). A range of BCTs was identified: instruction/demonstration, behavioural practice, prompts/cues, social support, environmental restructuring; incentives/rewards appeared in some trials. Only one study explicitly used the COM-B. Evidence for effects on home brushing was limited and largely parent-reported (e.g., greater enthusiasm, longer brushing, transfer of songs/charts), with no robust quantitative measures of home routines. CONCLUSION(S): Based on this rapid review, a number of STPs reliably embedded BCTs strengthening children's capability and opportunity to brush with the possibility of a "spill over" effect to home brushing behaviour. However, evidence that STB is associated with sustained at-home brushing remains weak and poorly theorised. Future evaluations should pre-specify mechanisms, measure home brushing with validated tools, and test which BCT combinations most effectively bridge school-to-home behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.