SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
Effect of exercise training on clinical and physiological variables in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness, fatigue, reduced endurance, and impaired quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise training on clinical and physiological outcomes in adults with DM1. Six databases were searched for studies published between 2003 and 2023. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and longitudinal cohort studies involving adults with DM1 undergoing aerobic or resistance training were included, and risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analyses used standardized mean differences with fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Fourteen studies were included. Most studies demonstrated low risk of bias. Only one study reported any adverse events, and the incidence of these events was similar in occurrence between the intervention and standard care only groups. Meta-analysis demonstrated a moderate improvement in strength (p = 0.022). Endurance showed a large but non-significant pooled effect (p = 0.14). Meta-analyses for fatigue (p = 0.49) and sleep (p > 0.05) were inconclusive. Narrative synthesis indicated improvements in most clinical and physiological outcomes, while sleep outcomes showed minimal or inconsistent changes across studies. Exercise training appears safe and provides moderate benefits for strength and selected clinical and physiological outcomes in adults with DM1. Future well-powered trials with standardized protocols are needed to optimize exercise prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.