ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
The impact of CHEK2 status on radiosurgical outcomes in breast cancer brain metastases.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in women, with many patients developing brain metastases (BM). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a standard treatment for BCBM, achieving local control rates exceeding 90%. However, some patients remain resistant to SRS, and genetic factors may influence treatment outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of CHEK2 mutations on radiation response and local control in patients with BCBM treated with SRS. We analyzed 11 patients with confirmed pathogenic CHEK2 mutations and 43 total BCBM treated with CyberKnife SRS. Data on demographics, performance status, and tumor characteristics were collected. Primary endpoints included local control and distant BM-free survival, while secondary endpoints were the rate of post-SRS leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and the need for additional intervention. The female-to-male ratio was 10:1, with a median age at BC diagnosis of 52 years (range 35-76). Receptor status showed 7 patients were HR+/HER2-, 2 patients were HR+/HER2+, 1 patient was HR-/HER2+, and 1 patient had triple-negative breast cancer. There was a median of 3 BCBM (range 1-6) at presentation, with 7 patients also having extracranial metastasis. Median age at SRS was 55 years (range 41-86), and all patients received systemic chemotherapy prior to SRS. Median maximum diameter of BCBM was 9.0 mm (range 2.6-32.0), with a median prescribed dose of 22 Gy (range 20-30). Median radiographic follow-up was 18.7 months (range 1.9-107.8). Local control rates were 97.8%, 90.9%, and 72.7% at 3, 6, and, 12 months, respectively. Four patients developed LMD and 4 experienced distant recurrence, requiring additional treatment. Local control and distant recurrence rates in patients with CHEK2 mutations were notably unfavorable compared to prior reports of SRS outcomes for BCBM. This suggests CHEK2 as a potential marker of poor prognosis in BCBM, although direct comparisons to CHEK2-wildtype patients are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41963546What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.