Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963508›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Biophysical and sociodemographic determinants of green infrastructure (GI) spatial distribution in Gdańsk, Poland.

Khansa Gulshad, Michał Szydłowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khansa GulshadFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, 80-233, Poland. khansa.gulshad@pg.edu.pl.
Michał SzydłowskiFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, 80-233, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization and climate change are intensifying environmental challenges in cities, necessitating innovative approaches to manage stormwater, mitigate urban heat, and enhance ecosystem services. Green Infrastructure (GI) has emerged as an effective solution to combat these challenges, yet research on GI spatial distribution is limited, and it remains unclear what factors drive or constrain their placement in cities. This study investigates the spatial distribution of GI in Gdańsk, Poland, employing a grid-based econometric framework to understand its relationship with biophysical and sociodemographic factors. GI density exhibits strong spatial clustering, with high density areas found to be in the western and eastern regions occupying state forests and low-density regions are found in northern, central urban areas, and parts of southern regions. Regression models, including ordinary least squares, spatial lag/error, and geographically weighted regression, indicated that GI distribution is constrained by urbanization indicator (impervious surface), while heat exposure (LST), and air quality variables (NO2, O3) act as spatial stress indicators that co-occur with areas of low GI with geographically varying effects. The findings align with the Gdańsk Greenery Policy (2023) but also highlight additional areas where GI provision can be expanded to improve climate adaptation, environmental equity and urban livability. The framework demonstrates how spatial data can support municipal decision-making and underscores the value of integrating environmental and socio-economic indicators into GI planning.

Indexed as

Climate changeGreen infrastructureRegression modelingSpatial statisticsUrbanization

Identifiers

PMID41963508
PMCPMC13230964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.