ArticleScientific reports2026
RSM based optimization and environmental impact assessment of a ternary blended one part alkali activated binder with enhanced mechanical performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of AABs is governed by a complex interplay of variables such as binder content, activator dosage, and supplementary materials. Therefore, systematic optimisation is essential to develop mixes that offer both high performance and environmental benefits. The performance of ternary one-part alkali-activated binders incorporating Class F fly ash, GGBS, and silica fume was evaluated and optimised using Box–Behnken–based response surface methodology. BBD was utilised to evaluate and fine-tune the effects of critical parameters such as the binder ratio, solid activator dosage, and silica fume content on compressive strength. Most of the trial mixes achieved strengths exceeding 40 MPa due to the synergistic effect of high GGBS content (30–35%), silica fume (5–10%), and an optimal alkali activator dosage. Among the evaluated mixes, 7.5% silica fume was found to provide the most balanced performance in terms of flowability, consistency, and setting behaviour. The optimised mix achieved compressive strengths of 47 MPa at 7 days and 54 MPa at 28 days, demonstrating its potential for structural elements, repair or retrofitting applications where compressive strength above 50 MPa is required. BBD was employed to model and optimise compressive strength. The developed quadratic model was statistically significant (p = 0.037; R² = 90.91%) with insignificant lack-of-fit (p > 0.05). The experimental validation showed good agreement between predicted and measured values, with errors below 10%, confirming the reliability of interpolation within the investigated domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.