ArticleScientific reports2026
Microscopic image dataset for air-permeability classification of patterned knitted fabrics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive multimodal dataset and an integrated analysis framework aimed at predicting key structural properties of patterned knitted fabrics using advanced image-based techniques. High-resolution microscope images were collected from forty-five fabric groups, each exhibiting different porosity levels, structural densities, and pattern configurations. For each fabric sample, twenty color images were captured under controlled lighting conditions, and 12 class labels were assigned based on expert-validated porosity categories. The dataset reflects real-world variability due to differences in yarn density, stitch geometry, and color–texture interactions, making the classification task inherently challenging. To evaluate the discriminative power of deep learning models on this fabric dataset, three widely used convolutional neural network architectures—VGG19, EfficientNet-B3, and DenseNet-121—were trained and compared using k-fold cross-validation. Class imbalance was addressed through the use of Focal Loss, and performance was assessed using accuracy, confusion matrices, and fold-averaged metrics. Among the tested architectures, VGG19 achieved the highest overall accuracy, while DenseNet-121 showed balanced performance across several porosity categories. Overall, VGG19 achieved the highest cross-validation accuracy of 87.42% and a final test accuracy of 79.01% demonstrating robust predictive performance for estimating the structural properties of patterned knitted fabrics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.