ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
CD22-targeted immunotherapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progressing following CD19-targeted immunotherapy.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients progressing after CD19-targeted immunotherapy in r/r B-ALL experience poor outcomes. CD22-targeted therapies, including CD22 CAR-T cells and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin, show promise as alternatives, although data in those patients is limited. This study retrospectively analyzed 43 r/r B-ALL patients who had previously received CD19-targeted therapy at two centers in China. Among these patients, 27.9% received blinatumomab, 58.1% received CD19 CAR-T cells, and 14% received both. After CD19-targeted therapy, 34.9% of patients experienced CD19-negative relapse, while the remaining patients maintained CD19 expression. Subsequent treatments included CD22 CAR-T cells (55.8%) and InO (44.2%). The median age was 39 (24-56) years, with an overall CR/CRi rate of 51.1% and 30.2% achieving MRD negativity. Among the 22 patients achieving CR/CRi, 13 (59.1%) experienced relapse. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 236 days (95% CI: 132-unreached), and the median OS has not been reached. Multivariate analysis showed similar remission rates and survival for CD22 CAR-T and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin therapies. Patients with extramedullary disease had worse remission rates, and those previously resistant to CD19-targeted therapy had shorter RFS. CD22-targeted therapies offer a potential option for patients progressing after CD19-targeted immunotherapy, but high relapse rates highlight the need for better strategies for lasting remission.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.