Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963451›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hybrid CNN-decision tree framework for efficient transmission line fault detection and classification: an XAI-based approach.

Anish Kumar Biswas, Md Faysal Ahamed, Fariya Bintay Shafi, M Murugappan, Muhammad E H Chowdhury, Rajeswaran Nagalingam, T Samraj Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anish Kumar BiswasDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, 6204, Bangladesh.
Md Faysal AhamedDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, 6204, Bangladesh.
Fariya Bintay ShafiDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Rajshahi, 6204, Bangladesh.
M MurugappanIntelligent Signal Processing (ISP) Research Lab, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kuwait College of Science and Technology, Block 4, 13133, Doha, Kuwait. m.murugappan@kcst.edu.kw.
Muhammad E H ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. mchowdhury@qu.edu.qa.
Rajeswaran NagalingamSchool of Computer Applications, IMS Unison University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
T Samraj LawrenceDepartment of IT, College of Engineering and Technology, Dambi Dollo University, Dambi Dollo, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. samraj@dadu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate, fast, and interpretable fault identification on electrical transmission lines is essential for maintaining power system stability and reducing outage durations. In this study, we propose a hybrid 1D convolutional neural network-Decision Tree (1D-CNN-DT) for transmission line fault detection and classification, in which the 1D-CNN acts solely as a feature extractor. During this process, the Decision Tree performs the final, interpretable classification. By preserving decision transparency and achieving high diagnostic accuracy, the proposed architecture differs from conventional end-to-end deep learning models. In MATLAB/Simulink, four distinct transmission line scenarios were simulated to evaluate the framework under realistic operating conditions. These scenarios included short lines, long distributed lines, source-end faults, and load-end faults. We developed a large, balanced dataset of three-phase voltage and current measurements per unit, covering standard operation and ten types of faults. According to the proposed model, fault detection accuracies were 99.89%, 99.94%, 99.94%, and 99.97%, and fault classification accuracies were 99.93%, 99.58%, 99.44%, and 99.86% across the four transmission line configurations. In addition to its high accuracy, the hybrid framework demonstrated significantly lower computational complexity and shorter training and inference times than conventional ANN- and LSTM-based approaches, without requiring manual signal transformations. The SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) are integrated to enhance trust and practical usability, providing both global and instance-level interpretability that reveals how voltages and currents contribute to individual faults. According to the results, a hybrid architecture that combines deep learning and explainable AI offers reliable, efficient, and transparent real-time transmission line monitoring and protection.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkExplainable AI(XAI)Fault classificationFault detectionMATLAB simulinkSHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP)Transmission line

Identifiers

PMID41963451
PMCPMC13222883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.