ArticleScientific reports2026
Honey yield prediction and neonicotinoid risk assessment utilizing a machine learning framework in smart agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reduction in pollinator abundance (predominantly honeybees) stemming from environmental and chemical stressors notably neonicotinoid pesticides poses serious threats to biodiversity and agricultural productivity. This study presents a scalable machine learning framework to foresee honey yield and assess the impact of neonicotinoid exposure. Drawing upon a curated dataset, of 825 records encompassing 16 agro-environmental and chemical parameters including colony counts, yield metrics, and pesticide residue concentrations. Subsequently, we assessed 13 classification models, marked improvement was evident, as ensemble models consistently outperformed individual learners. Notably, our proposed voting classifier (AgriBuzzEnsemble), which synergistically fuses Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), surpassed all baseline models, showcasing robust accuracy of 98%, a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.9751, a specificity of 0.9917, and an ROC AUC of 0.9985. Data preparation encompassed missing value imputation, outlier detection, feature scaling, and SMOTE based class balancing. For subsequent analysis, we employed Z-score filtering to detect and remove outliers, followed by a log1p transformation to mitigate skewness adhering to standard and well established preprocessing standards. Correlation analysis and statistical tests comprising McNemar's Test, ANOVA, and Tukey's HSD validated model reliability and confirmed the negative association between neonicotinoid burden and honey yield. Our proposed framework AgriBuzzEnsemble facilitates precision focused beekeeping by identifying yield risk zones and can be generalized to other regions facing pollinator stress, offering a robust and interpretable solution for sustainable agricultural planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.