ArticleScientific reports2026
Real-time medical images enhancement technique using Adaptive Histogram Equalization model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In low-contrast modalities like magnetic resonance imaging, medical image augmentation helps reveal anatomical structures and diseased locations. This paper presents an adaptive histogram-based contrast enhancement technique to improve medical picture quality while conserving structure. The suggested approach enhances tumor areas and tissue borders without artifacts using statistical normalization, adaptive histogram modeling, Gaussian-based intensity redistribution, and brightness-preserving contrast modification. T1, T2, FLAIR, and contrast-enhanced T1 MRI scans from the BraTS 2020 Brain Tumor Segmentation Dataset were used in experiments. The proposed method was compared to five state-of-the-art contrast enhancement methods: Histogram Equalization (HE), Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), Gamma Correction (GC), Retinex-based enhancement, and Adaptive Gamma Correction. Quantitative metrics like PSNR, MSE, SSIM, and entropy were used to evaluate the method’s performance. The suggested technique outperforms HE (31.46 dB), CLAHE (34.15 dB), Gamma Correction (32.74 dB), Retinex (35.21 dB), and Adaptive Gamma Correction (36.04 dB) in experimental PSNR (37.82 dB). The suggested technique has an SSIM of 0.962, compared to 0.891, 0.915, 0.902, 0.934, and 0.947 for the competing approaches. The approach decreases reconstruction error with an MSE of 18.4, lower than HE (42.7) and CLAHE (29.6). Qualitative analysis shows better contrast and tumor borders without brightness amplification. These findings show that the adaptive histogram approach enhances medical image analysis and diagnostic assistance systems robustly and efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.