Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963403›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Stampede detection and crowd analysis using CNN-LSTM and farneback optical flow.

Geetanjali Bhola, Sumit Srivastava, Hith Rahil Nidhan, Sanyam Kathed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Geetanjali BholaFaculty of Technology, University of Delhi, Delhi, NCT of Delhi, 110007, India.
Sumit Srivastava *Faculty of Information Technology, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India. sumit.srivastava@jaipur.manipal.edu.
Hith Rahil NidhanComputer Science and Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, NCT of Delhi, 110042, India.
Sanyam Kathed *Data Science and Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stampede incidents in densely populated environments remain a critical challenge for public safety, resulting in severe casualties and significant disruption. This paper presents a novel, data-driven framework for automated stampede detection and crowd risk classification, leveraging the integration of Farneback optical-flow computation with a hybrid CNN-LSTM architecture. Two complementary datasets, UCSD Anomaly detection dataset and Agoraset dataset, were combined to capture a broad spectrum of crowd behaviors and densities. The proposed system classifies crowd states into four distinct risk levels: normal, moderate, dense, and risky, thereby offering a more granular assessment than traditional binary models. The model was trained and evaluated on a balanced dataset of 10,000 annotated frames, with rigorous preprocessing and augmentation to ensure robustness. Experimental results demonstrate an accuracy of 99.75%, further cross-dataset evaluation on the UMN benchmark assesses the robustness under domain shift conditions. While the approach shows strong potential for real-time deployment in public event management and emergency response, current limitations include computational latency and challenges in ultra-dense, occluded scenarios.

Indexed as

Abnormal crowd behaviorCNN–LSTMCrowd analysisDeep learningOptical flowSpatio-temporalStampede detection

Identifiers

PMID41963403
PMCPMC13201541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.