Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963398›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Tripleknock: predicting lethal effect of three-gene knockout in bacteria by deep learning.

Peter X Geng, Jiaheng Hou, Jinyuan Guo, Xiaoqing Jiang, Huaiqiu Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter X GengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Future Technology, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Jiaheng HouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Future Technology, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Jinyuan GuoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Future Technology, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Xiaoqing JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Future Technology, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Huaiqiu ZhuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Future Technology, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. hqzhu@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32570752National Science and Technology Major Project 2025ZD01901200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the lethal effect of multi-gene knockout is essential for discovering novel antibiotic targets and metabolic engineering. Unlike single genes or gene pairs, three-gene combinations involve more intricate interactions, making experimental screening time-consuming. Computational methods, particularly Genome-scale metabolic model (GEM)-based Flux balance analysis (FBA), requires constructing new GEMs from experimental data, limiting its use for new species. Moreover, using FBA for three-gene knockout screening could take several years. Therefore, a faster and GEM-independent approach is needed to facilitate genome-wide three-gene knockout screening. Here, we introduce Tripleknock for predicting the lethal effects of three-gene knockouts. Tripleknock was trained using genome-derived protein sequence features from Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655, and three-gene knockout simulations using FBA. The model uses a threshold of 90% reduction in cell growth to define lethal effect as the prediction output. Compared to FBA, Tripleknock yields predictions ~ 20 × faster and achieves an average cross-species F1 score of 0.77 on six Enterobacteriaceae pathogens (FBA-defined labels). To mitigate information leakage, we additionally evaluated Tripleknock under a strict gene-level disjoint Train/Val/Test split (genes left out). We further benchmarked against an essentiality-rule baseline and literature-curated (n = 37) E. coli triple perturbations for external validation; no false positives were observed among predicted lethal cases (FP = 0) in this small curated set. To the best of our knowledge, this provides a reproducible baseline and evaluation framework for bacterial triple-knockout lethality prediction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEscherichia coli K12Gene Knockout TechniquesComputational BiologyEscherichia coliAntibiotic designBacteriaDeep learningLethal effectTriple-gene knockout

Identifiers

PMID41963398
PMCPMC13201573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.