Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963397›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Artificial intelligence and image processing framework for automated airway invasion detection and residue classification from swallowing endoscopy.

Luiza Araújo, Enzo Rangel, Anibal Cotrina-Atencio, Vitória Gomes Dos Santos, Ana Maria da Costa Dos Santos Reis, Hipólito Magalhães, Lidiane Ferreira, André Felipe Oliveira de Azevedo Dantas, Caroline Cunha do Espírito-Santo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luiza AraújoPostgraduate Program in Neuroengineering, Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Santos Dumont Institute, Zona Rural, Macaíba, 59288-899, RN, Brazil.
Enzo RangelGraduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN, Natal, 59078-970, Brazil.
Anibal Cotrina-AtencioDepartment of Computing and Electronics, Federal University of Espírito Santo - UFES, Vitória, 29075-910, Brazil.
Vitória Gomes Dos SantosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN, Natal, 59078-970, Brazil.
Ana Maria da Costa Dos Santos ReisMultiprofessional Residency Program in Health Care for People with Disabilities, Santos Dumont Institute - SDI, Macaíba, 59280-000, Brazil.
Hipólito MagalhãesDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Associated Graduate Program in Speech-Language Pathology - UFPB/UFRN/UNCISAL, Natal, 59012-570, Brazil.
Lidiane FerreiraDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN, Natal, 59012-300, Brazil.
André Felipe Oliveira de Azevedo DantasPostgraduate Program in Neuroengineering, Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Santos Dumont Institute, Zona Rural, Macaíba, 59288-899, RN, Brazil.
Caroline Cunha do Espírito-SantoPostgraduate Program in Neuroengineering, Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Santos Dumont Institute, Zona Rural, Macaíba, 59288-899, RN, Brazil. caroline.santo@isd.org.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is a widely used instrumental method for dysphagia, but its interpretation depends on lighting and evaluator experience. This study developed and validated a framework artificial intelligence (AI) and image processing to detect penetration, aspiration, and classify residues according to the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPR-SRS). The system combines anatomical tracking of the epiglottis, arytenoids, and vocal folds with contrast adjustments, color-based segmentation, and enhancement filters, optimizing the visibility of clinical events. In validation with 60 videos, accuracy was of 0.90 for penetration and 0.87 for aspiration, with sensitivities of 1.00 and 0.90, specificities of 0.80 and 0.85, and Kappa values of 0.80 and 0.75. For residues in the pyriform sinuses, accuracy ranged from 0.91 to 0.95, sensitivity from 0.91 to 1.00, specificity from 0.83 to 1.00, and Kappa = 0.87. In the valleculae, accuracy ranged from 0.95 to 1.00, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.91-1.00 and Kappa = 0.91. These findings highlight its assistive potential for FEES analysis and clinical decision-making support in penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue classification, a capability not previously reported.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersEndoscopyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansSensitivity and SpecificityComputerDeglutition disordersEndoscopyNeural networksPharyngeal residuesRespiratory aspiration

Identifiers

PMID41963397
PMCPMC13230543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.