ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of a machine learning model using structured and unstructured features for predicting surgery among patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: development and validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy and often requires surgery when symptoms persist. However, identifying patients requiring surgery remains challenging. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for surgery in CTS patients by integrating standardized common data model (CDM)-based structured data with unstructured data from electromyography (EMG) reports and radiology reports. We retrospectively analyzed 3602 adults diagnosed with CTS at Seoul Metropolitan Boramae Medical Center, of whom 696 (19.3%) underwent surgery within 365 days. Structured CDM data were combined with unstructured text processed using topic modeling, and EMG severity grades were extracted. Predictive models were developed using LASSO logistic regression, gradient boosting machine (GBM), and random forest. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and other metrics, and feature importance was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Models incorporating unstructured text and EMG grades outperformed those using structured data alone (AUROC 0.792 vs. 0.759, P < 0.001), with GBM achieving the best performance. SHAP analysis highlighted EMG grade and key text-derived topics as major predictors. These findings demonstrate that combining structured clinical data with unstructured text analysis can effectively predict surgical outcomes in CTS and support clinical decision-making through an integrated data-driven approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.