ArticleScientific reports2026
Computational identification of conserved dengue virus envelope protein epitopes for vaccine design and immunodiagnostic platform.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue virus (DENV) remains a major global health challenge, with its incidence increasing sharply over the past two decades. More than 390 million infections occur annually, affecting nearly half of the world’s population. Despite progress in vaccine research, the coexistence of four antigenically distinct dengue virus serotypes (DENV1-4) complicates vaccine and diagnostic development, emphasizing the urgent need for improved preventive and diagnostic strategies. Immunoinformatics and computational vaccinology are powerful tools to elucidate host–pathogen interactions and accelerate vaccine and diagnostic discovery. As vaccination remains the most effective strategy to reduce the dengue burden and accurate diagnostics are essential for surveillance, this study identified conserved and serotype-specific dengue epitopes to support vaccine and diagnostic development. We conducted a comprehensive in silico analysis of the DENV envelope (E) protein across all four serotypes to identify conserved and serotype-specific T-cell and B-cell epitopes. Molecular docking was performed to evaluate HLA-binding affinity between predicted epitopes and their corresponding alleles, and intrinsically disordered regions of the dengue envelope protein were analyzed to identify flexible segments potentially involved in immune recognition. Finally, normal mode analysis was carried out to assess the structural flexibility and stability of the resulting epitope–HLA complexes. Our analysis revealed highly conserved CD8+ (CD4 +) epitopes, such as E57, E135, E175, E313 and E417 (E133, E134, and E234) that remain antigenic despite sequence variation, suggesting their potential use in a universal dengue vaccine. We also identified distinct serotype-specific epitopes, which could serve as molecular signatures for precise immunodiagnostic assays (DENV-2: E236, E267, and E424; DENV-3: E204, E229, E274, E350, and E410; and DENV-4: E402, E403, E65, and E446). Population coverage analysis predicted a global reach of 66.87%, with high representation in East Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Molecular docking and normal mode analyses confirmed stable peptide–HLA interactions with favorable binding energies, particularly for LTDYGALTL–HLA-A01:01 and DTAWDFGSI–HLA-A26:01 complexes. Collectively, this integrative in silico framework identifies epitope candidates that can inform next-generation multivalent dengue vaccines and enhance serotype-specific diagnostic platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.