ArticleNPJ science of food2026
Deep learning enable precision authentication of seasonal and processing signatures in tieguanyin tea.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Authenticating specialty tea products remains a critical challenge in premium food markets, yet current analytical approaches are constrained by limited reproducibility and susceptibility to instrumental variation. Here, we present a deep learning framework that transforms liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomic data into image representations, enabling robust authentication of tea products under real-world analytical conditions. Profiling 274 Tieguanyin tea samples across seasonal harvests (spring and autumn) and processing methods (light-scented and strong-scented), our approach achieved 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.4%-96.0%) classification accuracy-substantially outperforming conventional multivariate and machine learning methods (sPLS-DA: 85.5%; random forest: 87.3%). Critically, when subjected to chromatographic drift-a pervasive source of analytical irreproducibility-our model maintained 78.2% accuracy while traditional methods degraded to 69.1%. This framework addresses fundamental limitations in untargeted metabolomics, offering a generalizable solution for food authentication that extends beyond tea to broader applications in agricultural product verification and systems biology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.