Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41963353›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2026

Producing concept-motivated signs supports learning of STEM in American Sign Language.

Rachel Sortino, Christina Kim, Thalia Guettler, Katie McClyman, Lorna Quandt, Alicia Wooten, Rachel Pizzie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel SortinoGallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.
Christina KimGallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.
Thalia GuettlerGallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.
Katie McClymanGallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.
Lorna QuandtGallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.
Alicia WootenGallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.
Rachel PizzieGallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA. rachel.pizzie@gallaudet.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-7170

Funding

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program 2444847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deaf and hard of hearing students often lag behind their hearing peers in STEM classes, in part because of a lack of STEM learning resources available in sign language. Past research shows the benefits of embodied cognition through iconic gestures for hearing students. We investigated whether signed lessons that emphasized connections to English or to concepts supported embodied learning of STEM topics. In Study 1, we developed and validated pairs of lessons in two signing styles: English-motivated (EM) and concept-motivated (CM). In Study 2, we compared learning from those two signing styles. Participants' scores increased from pre- to post-test, indicating learning, but there were no differences based on signing style. However, when we examined participants' signed summaries, we found that increased production of CM signs, but not EM signs, was related to higher post-test scores. This result suggests that the benefits from embodied learning emerge when learners produce the concept-motivated signs themselves.

Identifiers

PMID41963353
PMCPMC13254344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.