ArticleNature communications2026
RESCUE: recovery of unattributed expression patterns in spatial transcriptomics.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MilliMap: interactive closed-loop analysis for spatial omics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- RESCUE: recovery of unattributed expression patterns in spatial transcriptomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables gene expression profiling while preserving the spatial architecture of intact tissue. Analyzing ST data often proceeds by first extracting cell-level information, typically through cell segmentation or cell-type deconvolution. However, a critical oversight has been that a substantial portion of molecular expression is systematically lost or unannotated by these methods. This lost expression can arise from diverse and biologically important sources like fragile or underrepresented cell types, subcellular structures like neurites, and extracellular expression. These omissions can result in biased analyses and incorrect or incomplete biological interpretations. We describe a new computational method, RESCUE, that can recover the unattributed spatial expression patterns missed by existing ST analysis methods and enable robust inference even when reference is incomplete. We validate RESCUE using MERFISH data from the honey bee brain and apply it to multiple ST datasets to demonstrate how it can reveal novel insights into complex tissue biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.