ArticleNature communications2026
Behavioural states control binocular vision through input-specific mechanisms.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Binocular vision is essential for high-acuity stereopsis, depth perception and goal-directed behaviours, but whether binocular visual processing is modulated according to an animal's behaviroal state remains unknown. By combining behavioural tracking with calcium imaging in layer 2/3 excitatory neurons in the binocular zone of the primary visual cortex (bV1) of adult mice, we demonstrate that binocularity and binocular integration change rapidly in a state-dependent manner via eye-/input-specific cellular mechanisms: responses to contralateral eye stimulation are strongly enhanced during high arousal states, much more so than ipsilateral responses, and binocular integration shifts from sublinear to supralinear summation, which both are explained by the differential modulation of thalamic and callosal inputs to bV1 neurons. We thus propose that the state-dependent modulation of bV1 neurons adapts an animal's visual perception to its behavioural demands by reducing the relative impact of binocular vision during high-arousal states while enhancing the impact of peripherally-derived monocular vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.