ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2026
Clinical validation of a high-performance somatic exome sequencing assay: from target-enrichment strategy to variant calling.
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical whole-exome sequencing (WES) has revolutionized clinical diagnostics by enabling scalable, cost-effective molecular profiling to detect somatic variants and identify novel therapeutic targets. In particular, the clinical evaluation of somatic variants relies on both high-quality sequencing data and robust variant detection with rapid turnaround times. We developed an updated WES workflow utilizing a co-developed Twist Bioscience targeting panel and the DRAGEN (Dynamic Read Analysis for GENomics) platform, benchmarked with cell line mixtures containing >40,000 simulated variants and a clinical cohort of FFPE tumor specimens. Our assay, the Broad Clinical Somatic Whole Exome Assay V6.0, demonstrated high sensitivity (96.9% for SNVs with variant allele fraction [VAF] >10% at ≥125X; 93.5% for InDels with VAF > 20% at ≥125X) and low false positive rates (0.04 and 0.01 per Mb, respectively). The assay meets clinical requirements and enables large-scale, accurate variant profiling of cancers, expanding opportunities for molecular diagnostics across diverse clinical settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.