ArticleNature communications2026
Balancing the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy by affinity combination.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting Regnase-1 in B7-H3-CAR T cells reprograms the tumor microenvironment and enhances antitumor efficacy for osteosarcoma.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) binding affinity to its ligand affects CAR-T-cell functionality. Affinity engineering towards lower binding strengths might mitigate therapeutic side effects arising from intense CAR-T-cell activation as well as tumor relapse due to antigen-escape or limited persistence of CAR-T cells during sustained activation via high-affinity receptors. Here we characterize a broad range of CARs with varying affinities to the same target epitope and leverage the insights we gain to design a combined high- and low-affinity CAR product. While CAR affinity impacts in vitro functionality minimally, it strongly correlates with tumor control in vivo. Low-affinity binders cause only mild cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in humanized mouse models at the expense of anti-tumour efficiency. In mixtures with low-affinity CARs, high-affinity CARs maintain strong functionality while showing reduced signs of exhaustion and monocyte-induced cytokine production, compared to high-affinity CAR-T cells alone. In long term in vitro and in vivo settings, low-affinity CAR-T cells dominate over time, proving more resilience to chronic antigen exposure. Overall, our findings demonstrate that affinity combination represents a promising strategy to generate more effective CAR-T-cell products with an improved therapeutic index, beyond affinity engineering alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.