ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Complete Response to Nivolumab-Relatlimab Following Progression of Invasive Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma on First-Line Nivolumab-Ipilimumab: A Case Report.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare and aggressive subtype of melanoma with a notably worse prognosis than cutaneous melanoma (CM) due to its occult presentation and unique molecular profile. For advanced cases, immunotherapy has improved outcomes in recent years, although more significantly for CM. The recently approved combination of nivolumab and relatlimab has emerged as a promising option for advanced melanoma and a potential alternative to the well-established nivolumab-ipilimumab regimen. Due to the rarity of MM often limiting thorough evaluation in trials, there remains a lack of guidance regarding the most appropriate regimen for optimal patient outcomes. CASE: A 70-year-old male with T4aN0M0 sinonasal MM was initiated on neoadjuvant nivolumab-ipilimumab therapy; however, disease progression soon after rendered the tumor unresectable. Despite undergoing 4 cycles, metastatic progression ensued, necessitating a shift to nivolumab-relatlimab therapy. Following 8 cycles of nivolumab-relatlimab alongside radiation to metastatic sites, the patient achieved a complete response, with no signs of active disease. Unfortunately, during a seven-week treatment interruption due to suspected immune-related gastrointestinal toxicity requiring corticosteroids, routine PET-CT monitoring revealed findings suspicious for new metastasis. Despite one additional cycle of immunotherapy, the patient's functional status deteriorated. Although repeat imaging showed stable disease, the patient elected to transition to supportive care without further treatment.
conclusionThis case exemplifies the use of nivolumab-relatlimab in achieving a complete response in a patient with advanced sinonasal MM that progressed after nivolumab-ipilimumab. While further investigation is needed to clarify the comparative efficacy of existing combination immunotherapy options, this report highlights nivolumab-relatlimab as a promising option with a potentially favorable safety profile in this rare and aggressive melanoma subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.