ArticleLupus science & medicine2026
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus across five registries: the LupusNet federated data network.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study describes baseline demographics, clinical characteristics and treatments of patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the time of registration in the registries of the Lupus Federated Data Network (LupusNet).
methodsData were collected from five SLE registries in four global regions: APLC (Asia Pacific), FORWARD (North America), RELESSER (Europe), GLADEL 2.0 and Almenara (Latin America). LupusNet uses a federated data network approach and a privacy-by-design method, where only aggregated results are shared. Demographics, disease activity (based on Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores), accumulated damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index) and treatment use data were mapped and harmonised using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model V.5.4.
resultsA total of 10 370 patients were included in the analysis; of those, 3908 patients were in Asia Pacific, 3066 in North America, 1806 in Europe and 1590 in Latin America. The majority of patients were female (91%); the median (IQR) duration from SLE diagnosis to registry entry ranged from 5 (1-12) to 12 (6-19) years. Heterogeneity in disease activity was observed across registries based on mean (SD) SLEDAI-2K total (3.0 (4.1)-7.0 (7.4)) and PGA (0.4 (0.5)-1.2 (1.0)) scores. Across registries, SLE features most common were related to serologic activity (low complement and increased DNA binding (19%-47%)); other common clinical features included proteinuria and arthritis (4%-37%). Cataracts (4%-9%) were the most common characteristic related to accumulated damage. Glucocorticoids, antimalarials and immunosuppressants were the most commonly used treatments, with variations in their proportions observed across registries.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate significant heterogeneity in clinical characteristics and treatment patterns across the registries in LupusNet. By recognising regional differences, findings from LupusNet may help guide treatment approaches in SLE and optimise patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.