Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41962973›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Trends in ethnic disparities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health interventions and the role of social investment and inclusive policies: a mixed-methods study in Ecuador, 2004-2018.

Paulina Rios-Quituizaca, Jesus Endara-Mina, Leonardo Zanini Ferreira, Nancy Armenta-Paulino

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paulina Rios-QuituizacaFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, Carrera de Obstetricia, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador pbrios@uce.edu.ec.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-3812
Jesus Endara-MinaFacultad de Ciencias Juridicas y Políticas, Carrera de Derecho, Universidad Tecnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8255-2199
Leonardo Zanini FerreiraPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Nancy Armenta-PaulinoDepartamento de Cirugía, Ciencias Médicas y Sociales, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá (España), Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-2841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEthnic disparities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health (RMNCH) persist in Latin America, rooted in structural racism and colonial legacies. Evidence on the temporal evolution of these disparities and the impact of policies targeting Indigenous populations remains limited. Following the 2000 economic crisis, Ecuador showed the region's largest ethnic gaps in intervention coverage and social determinants. Since 2008, inclusion policies have advanced. This study analysed trends in RMNCH coverage, social determinants and their potential association with policies and strategies over 14 years.

methodsUsing a mixed-methods design, we analysed three nationally representative surveys (2004, 2012 and 2018) to assess changes in social determinants and the coverage of six RMNCH services; defined as the proportion of women and children receiving essential health services across the continuum of care, including family planning, antenatal care, skilled birth attendance and child immunisation, stratified by ethnicity (Indigenous women and children, Afro-Ecuadorian populations and Mestizo and White populations). We estimated absolute inequality measures and adjusted coverage ratios using Poisson regression models. Through a literature review and temporal graphs, we analysed plans, policies and strategies in health, education and ethnic inclusion during the same period to estimate potential impact.

resultsBy 2018, Indigenous populations doubled their representation in the highest wealth quintiles (10% to 20%) and increased secondary education attainment (25% to 45%), with slower progress in rural areas. RMNCH coverage, including prenatal care, institutional deliveries and professional-assisted births, rose significantly (27% to 75%) among Indigenous populations. Afro-Ecuadorians also experienced improvements in RMNCH coverage and social determinants, though progress was less pronounced compared with Indigenous groups. Although ethnic gaps persisted, inequalities declined over the study period. These reductions coincided with increased social investment in rural health and education, constitutional recognition of plurinationality, and policies promoting intercultural health practices. However, gaps in monitoring and impact evaluation were evident.

conclusionsEcuador demonstrates that inclusive and integrated policies, leadership, social participation and sustained social investment can reduce ethnic inequalities, promote the integral development of society and strategies that should be maintained. Temporal studies based on routine surveys are crucial for monitoring the impact of such policies. These findings provide a pre-pandemic benchmark and serve as a reference for countries aiming to improve health outcomes among Indigenous and Afro-descendant populations and advance the Sustainable Development Goals.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PolicyReproductive HealthSouth American PeopleAdultChildEcuadorFemaleHumansInfantInfant HealthInfant, NewbornPregnancySocial Determinants of HealthSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthHealth EquityHealth policyHealth Services AccessibilityMaternal medicineSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID41962973
PMCPMC13084814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.