Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41962971›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review.

Yevheniia Varyvoda, Raymond Yurika, God'sgift N Chukwuonye, Sheila Soto, Teresa Manygoats, John Ehiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yevheniia VaryvodaDepartment of Community, Environment, and Policy, The University of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA varyvoda@arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-2100
Raymond YurikaDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, The University of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
God'sgift N ChukwuonyeDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, The University of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Sheila SotoDepartment of Public Health Practice, Policy, & Translational Research, The University of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Teresa ManygoatsArizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
John EhiriDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, The University of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Trauma Recovery Center (TRC) is an evidence-based model of care designed to meet the needs of underserved survivors of violent crime through the provision of comprehensive mental health and psychosocial services. Originally developed in the USA, the TRC model has been adopted by 53 hospitals and outpatient settings nationwide. Its demonstrated effectiveness supports its potential for international scale-up, particularly in countries seeking to improve their responses to interpersonal violence and trauma. While the core principles of the model remain universally consistent, there is a striking paucity of synthesised evidence on implementation barriers and enablers, necessary to guide effective scale-up and adaptation across diverse systems of care. The objective of this scoping review is to identify and map barriers and facilitators that influence implementation of the TRC model of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review was initiated in May 2025 and is expected to be completed in May 2026. The review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Results will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The initial PubMed search was conducted in June 2025. The finalised search strategy will subsequently be applied to PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus databases. A two-stage screening process using Covidence software will be used to determine study eligibility. To be included, studies will be required to have examined implementation-related barriers or facilitators associated with at least one core element of the TRC model or analogous psychosocial support programmes within the context of comprehensive, trauma-informed care for survivors of violent crime. Studies conducted within the USA and published in English between 2001 and 2026 will be included.All studies will be independently assessed for eligibility. Data will be extracted and mapped using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Extracted data will be analysed and synthesised narratively across the five CFIR domains, accompanied by summary tables that describe how the findings relate to the review objective. Existing knowledge gaps will be identified and discussed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Experts from the National Alliance of Trauma Recovery Centers (NATRC) will be engaged to provide feedback on the study findings and support the dissemination of results. Dissemination activities will include peer-reviewed publications and presentations at academic conferences and professional events, such as NATRC's technical assistance and learning community training sessions.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesTrauma CentersHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicViolenceCrimeImplementation SciencePsychosocial InterventionVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID41962971
PMCPMC13084932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.