ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2026
Which healthcare services did children and adolescents use before presentation at specialised outpatient clinics for post-COVID-19 condition? Descriptive findings from the Post-COVID Kids Bavaria study.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMeasuring the utilisation of healthcare services in children and adolescents with symptoms suggesting post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) until their presentation at specialised outpatient clinics (SOC).
methods117 patients (aged 4-17 years) with symptoms suggesting PCC were recruited for study participation in SOCs of the comprehensive care network 'Post-COVID Kids Bavaria' for children and adolescents with PCC in Bavaria, Germany. Information on healthcare utilisation from their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection until presentation at an SOC was collected via telephone interviews with parents.
resultsParticipants had a median of 6.5 physician contacts (Q1-Q3: 3.8-11.5), mainly in person (99.1%, n=116) and rarely used telemedicine (21.4%, n=25). Contacts were mainly with paediatricians (72.6%, n=85), followed by general practitioners (46.2%, n=50). Non-pharmacological measures were used by 56 participants (47.9 %), with therapies by Heilpraktiker and osteopaths being used most commonly (30.8%, n=36). 76 participants (65.0%) were prescribed medications, and 71 (60.7%) used non-prescribed medications or supplements.
conclusionsChildren and adolescents with PCC symptoms frequently consult healthcare services, often self-initiated measures provided by Heilpraktiker and osteopaths, until their presentation at an SOC. This may be due to unclear care pathways. Paediatricians and general practitioners are key providers, making their expertise and strong connections with SOCs essential for early diagnosis and appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.