Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41962532›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026

Analysis of the functional performance of amputees on the timed up and go scale compared to healthy volunteers: cross-sectional observational study.

Juliana Dos Santos Guilherme Ribeiro, Denise Matheus, Rafael de Albuquerque Lima, Artur Cesar Aquino Dos Santos, Andre Tadeu Sugawara, Linamara Rizzo Battistella, Felipe Fregni, Marta Imamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juliana Dos Santos Guilherme RibeiroInstituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Denise MatheusInstituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rafael de Albuquerque LimaInstituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Artur Cesar Aquino Dos SantosInstituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Andre Tadeu SugawaraInstituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Medicina Legal, Bioética, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Linamara Rizzo BattistellaInstituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Medicina Legal, Bioética, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Felipe FregniNeuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Marta ImamuraInstituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Medicina Legal, Bioética, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: marta.imamura@fm.usp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amputation of a limb directly impacts functioning. The lack of standardization in the assessment of lower-limb amputees complicates the identification of actual impairments. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test has been validated and used in these individuals' clinical practice. The authors compared the performance of lower-limb amputees with that of healthy volunteers and identified the factors involved in performing the test and, consequently, in the patient´s functioning ability. Lower limb amputee individuals referred to the Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of São Paulo (IMREA-HCFMUSP) were included, as well as healthy volunteers, between August 2020 and July 2022. Statistical data were analyzed using Stata 14, with a significance level set at α < 0.05. The results indicate that TUG times were statistically different between the groups, which can be explained by factors such as age, mobility measured by the Amputee Mobility Predictor Questionnaire (AMP), and prosthetic use. The TUG test can be standardized in clinical practice for amputee patients, and identifying the factors influencing its values supports the structuring of rehabilitation for lower-limb amputations.

Indexed as

AmputationLower limbsRehabilitationTimed up and go

Identifiers

PMID41962532
PMCPMC13091532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.